The most significant antitrust lawsuit pending against Google entered a new phase this week when a federal judge announced that he would deliver his verdict by August 2025. It might hamper the tech giant’s control over the internet search market and impact the future of competitiveness in the technology industry.
In a ruling this week, Judge Amit P. Mehta of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia found that Google has a monopoly in the online search business. He stated that Google has more than a 90% market share of the search business and that such a great position it owes to exclusive deals with big companies like Apple. Through these agreements, Google has been set as the default search engine on myriad platforms by taking away significant visibility and use from its rivals, like Bing by Microsoft.
Next steps: Determining remedies
Following the decision, Judge Mehta laid out the next steps for the case. The Department of Justice (DOJ) and the attorneys general of several states were asked to file proposals on what the remedies could be by the end of 2024. These would reflect on how Google’s market position should be adjusted to ensure fair competition. A second trial, expected to occur in March or April 2025, will put the proposed remedies to test and determine what fit is the proper course.
Potential remedies under consideration include:
- Restricting Exclusive Contracts: Limiting the possibilities for Google to secure exclusive agreements making its search engine default on various devices and browsers.
- Corporate Restructuring: Exploring ways to break up Google’s operations, like separating its search engine from other services like the Chrome browser and Android operating system.
The DOJ is considering pressing more consequential charges, including the breakup of the company-a meaningful precedent in future antitrust actions against other major tech firms including Amazon, Apple, and Meta.
The influence of Artificial Intelligence
One of the unique aspects in this case is how rapidly-changing the technology is in question — AI. During the court hearing last week, Judge Mehta referred to how AI, through devices such as chatbots from companies like OpenAI and Microsoft, is introducing new methods for competing with Google’s search services.
All these AI technologies integrated into the search functions create opportunities and challenges alike. Accordingly, as AI-driven search tools gain more traction, they could dramatically alter the competitive landscape in the search market. This is in line with both the DOJ and Google calling AI company witnesses to explain how these technologies will affect the future of search.
Broader context: Antitrust scrutiny on tech companies
The case against Google is part of a broader regulatory push against the market power of major technology companies. In recent years, federal and state authorities have opened antitrust investigations and lawsuits against other industry leaders, including Amazon, Apple, and Meta. Those investigations were born of concerns that the business practices of the companies could stifle competition, hold down innovation and touch every corner of public life, from commerce to social interactions.
Implications for the tech industry
The result of this antitrust case might have wide ramifications, not only for Google but for the overall tech ecosystem. If the judgment comes to restrict, reshape the business operation, or even break up Google, that will definitely influence how other giants in the industry would operate and compete. Moreover, it will set a legal example for addressing monopolistic behavior in the tech sector.
RELATED
What’s next?
As the case continues to forge ahead, every step of the way, all eyes are on Judge Mehta’s decisions to come and the proposals of the DOJ and state attorneys. A final judgment, due no later than August 2025, will bring another momentous point to the ongoing debate about the role big tech should play in the economy and society.
The remainder of the case involves waiting to see what Judge Mehta decides based upon the proposals by the DOJ and state attorneys. The proposed final judgment, by around August 2025, would have taken another critical turn in the ongoing debate about the place of big tech in the economy and society.
With the trial looming, both the DOJ and Google are seriously on their way in the process of establishing a strong case by leveraging extensive resources. This decision-to-be-made will also have the capacity to redefine not just the future of operations at Google but also the competitive perspective of the internet and the technology industry as a whole.
Watch this space for further updates on this highly critical case of antitrust as Oneily Gadget is following the case closely. We’ll do timely updates and take deep dives into how the ruling sets up the future of competition and innovation going forward in the tech world.